<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Josh Duhamel's Stripper Isn't Lying, Polygraph Expert Says!</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: elleree</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4472256</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4472256</guid>
					<description>um polygraph tests are pretty dodgy. perhaps she believed it was josh duhamel that doesnt mean it was. i thnk it is ridiculous that we rely on polygrahs... they DO NOT WORK and CAN BE TRICKED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um polygraph tests are pretty dodgy. perhaps she believed it was josh duhamel that doesnt mean it was. i thnk it is ridiculous that we rely on polygrahs&#8230; they DO NOT WORK and CAN BE TRICKED
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: herbert61</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4472240</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4472240</guid>
					<description>sorry,i meant carrot top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry,i meant carrot top.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: herbert61</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4472212</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4472212</guid>
					<description>poor fergie! wow maybe cotten top is available!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poor fergie! wow maybe cotten top is available!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: WMariah</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471966</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471966</guid>
					<description>Josh doesn't need to prove anything to you Perez...only to his wife.    As they say in my country:   Only those who stir the pot, really know what's in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh doesn't need to prove anything to you Perez&#8230;only to his wife.    As they say in my country:   Only those who stir the pot, really know what's in it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: highAboveManHttn</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471911</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471911</guid>
					<description>polygraphs are NOT reliable.  you can alter the results with movements as simple as constricting your sphincter - you should know about that perez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>polygraphs are NOT reliable.  you can alter the results with movements as simple as constricting your sphincter - you should know about that perez.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: MSMELLYMEL</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471818</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471818</guid>
					<description>Get rid of him fergie~Ur to fergilicious! N once a cheater always a cheater</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get rid of him fergie~Ur to fergilicious! N once a cheater always a cheater
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: RainManNum1</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471768</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471768</guid>
					<description>Actually, they are pretty damn accurate. Usually the mistakes are in the way the questions are worded. For example, if the exact question was simply if she had sex with him, she probably did, but it could have been 10 years ago. So she's most likely had sex with him, it's just important to see whether or not they were more specific about the questions. Did you have sex with this idiot on the night of **? would be a better way to have asked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, they are pretty damn accurate. Usually the mistakes are in the way the questions are worded. For example, if the exact question was simply if she had sex with him, she probably did, but it could have been 10 years ago. So she's most likely had sex with him, it's just important to see whether or not they were more specific about the questions. Did you have sex with this idiot on the night of **? would be a better way to have asked.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: stayathomepyrat</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471759</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471759</guid>
					<description>If my wife looked like her, i'd sleep with other women too. She looks like Barry Bonds after a round of HGH, look at the size of that dome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my wife looked like her, i'd sleep with other women too. She looks like Barry Bonds after a round of HGH, look at the size of that dome!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: missy1</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471724</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471724</guid>
					<description>I never understand why people cheat with strippers. I do not support the profession I dont care if they are feeding their family or kids its GROSS! I like Josh Duhamel but what a pig!!!!!! :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understand why people cheat with strippers. I do not support the profession I dont care if they are feeding their family or kids its GROSS! I like Josh Duhamel but what a pig!!!!!! <img src='http://perezhilton.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: KEEFER</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471696</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-04-josh-duhamels-stripper-isnt-lying-polygraph-expert-says#comment-4471696</guid>
					<description>gawd, what an asshole......and wuts up with that eddy munster hairstyle ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gawd, what an asshole&#8230;&#8230;and wuts up with that eddy munster hairstyle ??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
