Comments on: Nicole: 1 Paparazzi: 0 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0 Perez Hilton Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:22:24 +0000 Perezhilton.com by: MsDashira http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4463673 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:36:03 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4463673 Well done Nicole. TAKE your privacy back. In the Golden Days of Hollywood one actually had to have a card and belong to an honourable association to be allowed to publicly photograph and sell celebrity images. That way; the Hollywood elite were able to meet and greet their "artists of the lense" properly and received respect in turn. WHO else remembers this time? Respect for the profession of photographing and thus providing certified pictures to the press. IF a photo was leaked or tried to be sold outside of the association; well, not only would the star-power whomp them but the true photo-journalists would shun them also. For instance. There is a photograph on this site that purports to be of Orlando Bloom and Miranda Kerr. On a boat. IT is not Orlando. I have seen Orlando without his shirt on before. THAT pig is Elijah Wood. I have not seen him with his shirt off but I have spent far too many hours with him not to be able to do an accredited "id" by photo. Poor Orlando. HE couldn't gain that much weight if he tried. Lord knows, I used to cook him three good meals a day plus snacks. He ate very well and I know HE couldn't look like THAT; wrong placement of adam's apple. Remember: spies measure bone structures, look at hands, ways of walking and standing..... Expose the frauds!! Work with Perez! Prayers and blessings to Nicole!! Anya Blah, blah, blah The Undead Zombie Mother of Blog-Doom Well done Nicole. TAKE your privacy back. In the Golden Days of Hollywood one actually had to have a card and belong to an honourable association to be allowed to publicly photograph and sell celebrity images. That way; the Hollywood elite were able to meet and greet their "artists of the lense" properly and received respect in turn. WHO else remembers this time? Respect for the profession of photographing and thus providing certified pictures to the press. IF a photo was leaked or tried to be sold outside of the association; well, not only would the star-power whomp them but the true photo-journalists would shun them also. For instance. There is a photograph on this site that purports to be of Orlando Bloom and Miranda Kerr. On a boat. IT is not Orlando. I have seen Orlando without his shirt on before. THAT pig is Elijah Wood. I have not seen him with his shirt off but I have spent far too many hours with him not to be able to do an accredited "id" by photo. Poor Orlando. HE couldn't gain that much weight if he tried. Lord knows, I used to cook him three good meals a day plus snacks. He ate very well and I know HE couldn't look like THAT; wrong placement of adam's apple. Remember: spies measure bone structures, look at hands, ways of walking and standing….. Expose the frauds!! Work with Perez!

Prayers and blessings to Nicole!!

Anya Blah, blah, blah The Undead Zombie Mother of Blog-Doom

]]> by: Harv http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4463531 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:40:34 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4463531 Who the fuck would want to get close to her ?? She's a no talent z-list celebrity. Who the fuck would want to get close to her ??
She's a no talent z-list celebrity.

]]> by: mizsassyfras http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4462074 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:24:06 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4462074 ...and this girl is famous for what...? She made her bed, let her sleep in it. …and this girl is famous for what…? She made her bed, let her sleep in it.

]]> by: angel081086 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461702 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:27:12 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461702 love nicole. i hate paris.. ewww love nicole. i hate paris.. ewww

]]> by: Apt. 54 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461684 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:53:44 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461684 [re=4461550]Re: YODA SPEAKS[/re] Yoda, time to take your medication. I do not think Nicole Ritchie is talented either. But it is crazy to suggest that she has taken away opportunities from more talented people. It also crazy to suggest that she deserves to have people stalk her and yell abuse at her and harass her kids. Being famous does not mean that you deserve this kind of thing. You sound like a bitter failed actor. Re: YODA SPEAKS – Yoda, time to take your medication. I do not think Nicole Ritchie is talented either. But it is crazy to suggest that she has taken away opportunities from more talented people. It also crazy to suggest that she deserves to have people stalk her and yell abuse at her and harass her kids. Being famous does not mean that you deserve this kind of thing. You sound like a bitter failed actor.

]]> by: YODA SPEAKS http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461550 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:42:22 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461550 Right, here is some truths: Nicole Ritche and others like her with no formal training in the arts, use the opportunity of birth, or family to achieve a level of opportunity denied to many talented people because, frankly, they are standing in the way. Nicole and Paris used the media, called the media, manipulated the media to KEEP their profiles in the public, it was necessary as it can be argued that neither woman has any talent. She thought nothing of degrading her children's personal right to privacy by parading their photos in every rag to keep up her profile. If she really wanted privacy, SHE WOULD BE PRIVATE, AND IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE IF THE MONEY FOR PHOTOS WENT TO CHARITY, AS IT IS THE CONCEPT OF PRIVACY IN DISCUSSION. Now she is harassed and followed by the same switch she turned on, well sorry Nicole, you need to take responsibility for your actions, funny now right, now that YOUR CHILDREN'S SAFETY IS NOW AT RISK YOUR VOCAL. Many on the Pap reform worked hard to get laws passed and NO ONE SAW YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS? It is not right what the paps are doing but Nicole you need to keep your family private and not use them for your personal goals. I wish only good things for Nicole and her children, but be honest, be sincere and EVERYONE'S CHILDREN DESERVE PRIVACY. Luv Yoda Right, here is some truths: Nicole Ritche and others like her with no formal training in the arts, use the opportunity of birth, or family to achieve a level of opportunity denied to many talented people because, frankly, they are standing in the way. Nicole and Paris used the media, called the media, manipulated the media to KEEP their profiles in the public, it was necessary as it can be argued that neither woman has any talent. She thought nothing of degrading her children's personal right to privacy by parading their photos in every rag to keep up her profile. If she really wanted privacy, SHE WOULD BE PRIVATE, AND IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE IF THE MONEY FOR PHOTOS WENT TO CHARITY, AS IT IS THE CONCEPT OF PRIVACY IN DISCUSSION. Now she is harassed and followed by the same switch she turned on, well sorry Nicole, you need to take responsibility for your actions, funny now right, now that YOUR CHILDREN'S SAFETY IS NOW AT RISK YOUR VOCAL. Many on the Pap reform worked hard to get laws passed and NO ONE SAW YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS? It is not right what the paps are doing but Nicole you need to keep your family private and not use them for your personal goals. I wish only good things for Nicole and her children, but be honest, be sincere and EVERYONE'S CHILDREN DESERVE PRIVACY. Luv Yoda

]]> by: Melbourne Is A Tropical London http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461527 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:42:35 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461527 [re=4461522]Re: leonyx[/re] Yeah I agree. While what they are doing is rough, it's the price she pays for the cost of fame. Re: leonyx – Yeah I agree. While what they are doing is rough, it's the price she pays for the cost of fame.

]]> by: _Revolver _ http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461523 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:35:36 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461523 i had the first comment and it was taken down??? im shocked ! i never knew you read these perez haha fuck you i had the first comment and it was taken down??? im shocked ! i never knew you read these perez haha fuck you

]]> by: leonyx http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461522 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:29:57 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461522 she is an attention seeker , she made her name by calling paparatzies and telling them where was she and now she doesn't want them stalking her :rolls eyes: she is an attention seeker , she made her name by calling paparatzies and telling them where was she

and now she doesn't want them stalking her :rolls eyes:

]]> by: Melbourne Is A Tropical London http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461521 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:28:01 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-31-nicole-1-paparazzi-0#comment-4461521 I don't mean to get off topic here, but is it just me or does that guy in the background look like Jake Gyllenhaal? I don't mean to get off topic here, but is it just me or does that guy in the background look like Jake Gyllenhaal?

]]>