<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mad Max Is Back! Charlize Set To Star (Not As Max)</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: ratscar</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4463161</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4463161</guid>
					<description>Sam Worthington, hot aussie actor will be awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam Worthington, hot aussie actor will be awesome
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: hooroo8</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4461520</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4461520</guid>
					<description>Sam Worthington would make an excellent MadMax.  He has the manliness that the english guys just don't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam Worthington would make an excellent MadMax.  He has the manliness that the english guys just don't.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: RPORC</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4460798</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4460798</guid>
					<description>RPattz should be Mad Max!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RPattz should be Mad Max!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: PatKat9000</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4459973</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4459973</guid>
					<description>Theron would be GR8 in the movie but Mel should stay out of it.  He's a fossil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theron would be GR8 in the movie but Mel should stay out of it.  He's a fossil!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: blacklily.of.the.valley</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4459822</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4459822</guid>
					<description>This story hurts my post-apocalyptic, leather clad heart...Happy Halloween Mother Fuquers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story hurts my post-apocalyptic, leather clad heart&#8230;Happy Halloween Mother Fuquers
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: so emo it hurts </title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458633</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458633</guid>
					<description>I'd rather wait for the remake of the remake, in 2024</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd rather wait for the remake of the remake, in 2024
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: ba-buttons</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458562</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458562</guid>
					<description>-
I hope this doesn't happen.  The originals were great, especially the first two, rich with minimalism and unconventional story line.  Hollywood will remove any hint of cinema and replace it with explosions and titties.
-
One of the key things about the originals is that they did not have a cheesy romantic sub-plot tacked onto them.  I think Theron is a fine actor (and a total FOX) but her role will certainly be as Max's love interest, effectively killing any chance of me seeing the new movies.
-
Plus, at least the first two films were watershed events for the Australian film community.  They are regarded, rightfully, as amongst the best Aussie movies ever made.  I don't think people would like it if they remade "Citizen Kane" or "It's A Wonderful Life"
-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-<br />
I hope this doesn't happen.  The originals were great, especially the first two, rich with minimalism and unconventional story line.  Hollywood will remove any hint of cinema and replace it with explosions and titties.<br />
-<br />
One of the key things about the originals is that they did not have a cheesy romantic sub-plot tacked onto them.  I think Theron is a fine actor (and a total FOX) but her role will certainly be as Max's love interest, effectively killing any chance of me seeing the new movies.<br />
-<br />
Plus, at least the first two films were watershed events for the Australian film community.  They are regarded, rightfully, as amongst the best Aussie movies ever made.  I don't think people would like it if they remade "Citizen Kane" or "It's A Wonderful Life"<br />
-
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Cashmere Jay</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458420</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458420</guid>
					<description>[re=4458362]Re: BottomAceNJ[/re]  No, he is not involved with any of the Kardashians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458362">Re: BottomAceNJ</a> &ndash;   No, he is not involved with any of the Kardashians.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: ap076</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458405</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458405</guid>
					<description>I hope the hypocrite,  drunk, anti-semite takes a pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the hypocrite,  drunk, anti-semite takes a pass.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: sayitisntso</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458401</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-30-mad-max-is-back-charlize-set-to-star-not-as-max#comment-4458401</guid>
					<description>Christian Bale! Christian Bale! Christian Bale!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian Bale! Christian Bale! Christian Bale!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
