<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sandra Bullock Part of Husband's Custody Battle</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: MeThinking</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4461450</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4461450</guid>
					<description>[re=4444046]Re: wiseneverhadtoprovetheirpoint[/re] I'm confused by your posts? What are you talking about? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4444046">Re: wiseneverhadtoprovetheirpoint</a> &ndash;  I'm confused by your posts? What are you talking about? <img src='http://perezhilton.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: jojo927</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4449991</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4449991</guid>
					<description>she's gross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she's gross.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: rudy96</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4449048</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4449048</guid>
					<description>Maybe - maybe not. If she finished her sentencing and completed all court orders and she is willing to provide a stable home she might get her back. A judge does not like to see the child away from their mother if possible. If the courts do rule in her favor she will be under a microscope from DCFS for a long time. If you notice the way this arrticle was written he isn't saying he will get custody or even is going to try to get it. He is saying he wants her evaluated and watched and checked out throughly. Just because she has tax problems is not enough to keep her from her child. As long as she provides for the child that is what the courts will look at of most importance. That's the way it is rather you or I or anyone else agree's. The judge can use some discretion but they still have to follow the law they can not make it up as they go along. Believe it or not they have guide lines and limitations they have to follow themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe - maybe not. If she finished her sentencing and completed all court orders and she is willing to provide a stable home she might get her back. A judge does not like to see the child away from their mother if possible. If the courts do rule in her favor she will be under a microscope from DCFS for a long time. If you notice the way this arrticle was written he isn't saying he will get custody or even is going to try to get it. He is saying he wants her evaluated and watched and checked out throughly. Just because she has tax problems is not enough to keep her from her child. As long as she provides for the child that is what the courts will look at of most importance. That's the way it is rather you or I or anyone else agree's. The judge can use some discretion but they still have to follow the law they can not make it up as they go along. Believe it or not they have guide lines and limitations they have to follow themselves.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Ketielynn</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4446909</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4446909</guid>
					<description>So it was OK for him to sleep with a x-porn actress just not good enough to raise his child. I am NOT a fan of porn but he does seem a little hypocritical. I don't know enough about the background and/or drug use to really comment further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it was OK for him to sleep with a x-porn actress just not good enough to raise his child. I am NOT a fan of porn but he does seem a little hypocritical. I don't know enough about the background and/or drug use to really comment further.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Sunny Kim</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445788</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445788</guid>
					<description>first and foremost, she left the porn industry before she married mr sandra bullock. he has 3 other children from his first marriage that he barely sees. he knew what kind of job janine had before he married her. and let's also point out that james failed to pay taxes and was fined for many things associating with west coast choppers. he just threw janine under the bus so he could look like the good guy. and he left janine when she was pregos, janine never cheated on him. if youre going to call her names for being a porn star but hes a hero after he cheated on his wife, then obviously she has the better set of morals between the two of them. if the state thinks janine is such an unfit mother why dont they take custody of her son? obviously shes a good mom who never abandoned her child like jesse did. i see it as sandra bullock doesnt want a kid of her own and since jesse already has kids, well why not raise that one. less leg work. and sandra bullock is no angel. she is a home wrecker. she very well knew jesse was a married man! now janine is free from jail and no she doesnt do drugs you morons. not everyone in the industry does drugs. and if jesse thought she did, why not ask for custody when the baby was born? oh right cause u were riding the coat tails of sandra bullock and abandoned your baby! totally forgot. sunny should be with her mom janine. and i hope janine wins and gets jesse for alot of child support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first and foremost, she left the porn industry before she married mr sandra bullock. he has 3 other children from his first marriage that he barely sees. he knew what kind of job janine had before he married her. and let's also point out that james failed to pay taxes and was fined for many things associating with west coast choppers. he just threw janine under the bus so he could look like the good guy. and he left janine when she was pregos, janine never cheated on him. if youre going to call her names for being a porn star but hes a hero after he cheated on his wife, then obviously she has the better set of morals between the two of them. if the state thinks janine is such an unfit mother why dont they take custody of her son? obviously shes a good mom who never abandoned her child like jesse did. i see it as sandra bullock doesnt want a kid of her own and since jesse already has kids, well why not raise that one. less leg work. and sandra bullock is no angel. she is a home wrecker. she very well knew jesse was a married man! now janine is free from jail and no she doesnt do drugs you morons. not everyone in the industry does drugs. and if jesse thought she did, why not ask for custody when the baby was born? oh right cause u were riding the coat tails of sandra bullock and abandoned your baby! totally forgot. sunny should be with her mom janine. and i hope janine wins and gets jesse for alot of child support.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Kateedid didn't </title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445639</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445639</guid>
					<description>[re=4443800]Re: CalabasasHomeOwner[/re] he knew what he was getting into and if she is so bad, why was he with her in the first place. She has three kids and he wants to rip this little girl away from them even though he abandoned her and didn't see her till she was 4 yrs. old. Real nice dad there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4443800">Re: CalabasasHomeOwner</a> &ndash;  he knew what he was getting into and if she is so bad, why was he with her in the first place. She has three kids and he wants to rip this little girl away from them even though he abandoned her and didn't see her till she was 4 yrs. old. Real nice dad there!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: jezae86</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445626</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445626</guid>
					<description>They are so hot together. Ok, seriously. Just becuase "they" think they are so much better then this kids mom, doesn't give them the right to keep them apart. Parents do it everyday in a civil manner. Joint custody works just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are so hot together. Ok, seriously. Just becuase "they" think they are so much better then this kids mom, doesn't give them the right to keep them apart. Parents do it everyday in a civil manner. Joint custody works just fine.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Kateedid didn't </title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445588</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445588</guid>
					<description>SO HE ABANDONS THE GIRL IN THE WOMB AND WATCHES HER FOR LESS THAN A YEAR AND THEN SHOULD GET PATERNITY? I DON'T CARE WHAT HER MOTHER DID, HE WAS WITH HER WASN'T HE? IF SHE IS SUCH A BAD PERSON WHY DID HE HAVE A KID WITH HER? THIS IS BULLSHIT, THE KID BELONGS WITH HER MOTHER, HER FATHER ALREADY ABANDONED HER ONCE, AND I'M SURE HE WOULD DO IT AGAIN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO HE ABANDONS THE GIRL IN THE WOMB AND WATCHES HER FOR LESS THAN A YEAR AND THEN SHOULD GET PATERNITY? I DON'T CARE WHAT HER MOTHER DID, HE WAS WITH HER WASN'T HE? IF SHE IS SUCH A BAD PERSON WHY DID HE HAVE A KID WITH HER? THIS IS BULLSHIT, THE KID BELONGS WITH HER MOTHER, HER FATHER ALREADY ABANDONED HER ONCE, AND I'M SURE HE WOULD DO IT AGAIN!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Impossible222</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445472</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445472</guid>
					<description>If the child was born in 2002, there is no way she is 5 years old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the child was born in 2002, there is no way she is 5 years old.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Maureen Orth is a C unt</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445442</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-26-sandra-bullock-part-of-husbands-custody-battle#comment-4445442</guid>
					<description>Ill never understand by Bullock married Jesse James; although, I hear she's a real bitch in real life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ill never understand by Bullock married Jesse James; although, I hear she's a real bitch in real life.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
