<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Francis May Be Screwed Because Of The Security Video</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: BlissBlair</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4404832</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4404832</guid>
					<description>[re=4395820]Re: binkie[/re] Actually he was harassing a friend of Jayde's meaning acting like a tool on drugs so he totally deserved that drink in his face. Yep!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4395820">Re: binkie</a> &ndash;  Actually he was harassing a friend of Jayde's meaning acting like a tool on drugs so he totally deserved that drink in his face. Yep!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: BlissBlair</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4404830</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4404830</guid>
					<description>[re=4394991]Re: YUCK[/re] She's not ugly. That's just a bad pic. I've seen ugly. And yes more than likely Francis will go back to jail, he just got out last year, lol, what a loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4394991">Re: YUCK</a> &ndash;  She's not ugly. That's just a bad pic. I've seen ugly. And yes more than likely Francis will go back to jail, he just got out last year, lol, what a loser.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: aneurysm</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4399844</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4399844</guid>
					<description>[re=4394957]Re: Boondocks[/re] then she has always looked busted? lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4394957">Re: Boondocks</a> &ndash;  then she has always looked busted? lol.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: rudy96</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4398754</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4398754</guid>
					<description>[re=4398222]Re: JoliAvocat[/re] I will not go as far as saying how many yrs. I have been at it but I will say this: at this point it is a civil matter and the courts are backed up. My guess is that this will be settled out of court at an un-disclosed amount of $$$ with limitations for both parties regarding the media circuit. Will probably be hush order from both clients in settlement if there is a settlement. Anyone can sue anyone but that doesn't mean one party or the other will come out ahead except us of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4398222">Re: JoliAvocat</a> &ndash;  I will not go as far as saying how many yrs. I have been at it but I will say this: at this point it is a civil matter and the courts are backed up. My guess is that this will be settled out of court at an un-disclosed amount of $$$ with limitations for both parties regarding the media circuit. Will probably be hush order from both clients in settlement if there is a settlement. Anyone can sue anyone but that doesn't mean one party or the other will come out ahead except us of course.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: JoliAvocat</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4398222</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4398222</guid>
					<description>What crime did Jayde committ here? Pouring a drink on Joe isn't assault. Further, she did not hit him in the head as Perez thinks. I've viewed this video over and over. Was his actions reasonable? NO. Was it felony assault? YES!  It's him that seems to be in it deep here. Not Jayde as Perez thinks. I'd stake my 30 years as a CA atty. on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What crime did Jayde committ here? Pouring a drink on Joe isn't assault. Further, she did not hit him in the head as Perez thinks. I've viewed this video over and over. Was his actions reasonable? NO. Was it felony assault? YES!  It's him that seems to be in it deep here. Not Jayde as Perez thinks. I'd stake my 30 years as a CA atty. on it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: @v@</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397812</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397812</guid>
					<description>Wow. That's quite the video. That chick is some piece of work. Nasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That's quite the video. That chick is some piece of work. Nasty.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Shandon</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397391</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397391</guid>
					<description>What's distrubing is that she felt so comfortable and compelled to do what she did. She was not provoked and it appears her actions are being overlooked. This act does NOT happen without her self-initiated actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's distrubing is that she felt so comfortable and compelled to do what she did. She was not provoked and it appears her actions are being overlooked. This act does NOT happen without her self-initiated actions.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: lovelylove</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397377</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397377</guid>
					<description>This guy is pure scum, and i hope he gets the book thrown at him!!!! from the video yeah, she pored her drink on him, which i would hardly call assault, but someone else clearly knocked his head right before she did it. even so, did you see the way he was so comfortable grabbing that girl by the hair and not just pulling it but dragging her!! now thats distrubing!! PIECE OF S@#T!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy is pure scum, and i hope he gets the book thrown at him!!!! from the video yeah, she pored her drink on him, which i would hardly call assault, but someone else clearly knocked his head right before she did it. even so, did you see the way he was so comfortable grabbing that girl by the hair and not just pulling it but dragging her!! now thats distrubing!! PIECE OF S@#T!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Shandon</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397343</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397343</guid>
					<description>BOTTOMLINE - The "B" attacked first and got just what she deserved.  Regardless of male or female, no one should attack, touch, or pour a drink on anyone unless you are OK with your victim responding back in response to your actions.

If Brody is mad with his step sisters, then shame on him for expecting them to take the side and support a messy gal that intiated physical contact on someone who was just walking pass them, and not even close for which she extended herself to attack him.  Maybe Brody needs to realize his sisters does NOT want to be in the company of that kind of person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOTTOMLINE - The "B" attacked first and got just what she deserved.  Regardless of male or female, no one should attack, touch, or pour a drink on anyone unless you are OK with your victim responding back in response to your actions.</p>
<p>If Brody is mad with his step sisters, then shame on him for expecting them to take the side and support a messy gal that intiated physical contact on someone who was just walking pass them, and not even close for which she extended herself to attack him.  Maybe Brody needs to realize his sisters does NOT want to be in the company of that kind of person.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: WTF?!</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397182</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-joe-francis-may-be-screwed-because-of-the-security-video#comment-4397182</guid>
					<description>WTF is wrong with that girls face??????!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF is wrong with that girls face??????!!!!!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
