<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Levi HAWTston, Definitely Posing For Playgirl!</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: bonerlicious</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4435070</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4435070</guid>
					<description>What most of you limited, foul-mouthed idiots aren't getting is this:  the photo is not about the baby -- the baby in the photo is secondary.  The photo is shown here (and elsewhere i.e. GQ, etc.) because it's the only semi-NUDE photo there is of Levi Johnston and since this is about Levi Johnston posing NUDE at Playgirl.com, it's shown as a 'teaser' for the Playgirl story.   Anything to do with the baby, the baby being nude, etc., is an irrelevant aside.  You screaming drama queens are trying to make a non-topic into a topic!   Levi Johnston may be an animal-killing moron, but I'll be happy just seeing him wave his hairy boner at the camera!   As far as Perez Hilton:  he's further proof that any ordinary, non-talented, self-promoting, pig-faced hack can get his 15 minutes of fame nowadays if he's annoying and obnoxious enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What most of you limited, foul-mouthed idiots aren't getting is this:  the photo is not about the baby &#8212; the baby in the photo is secondary.  The photo is shown here (and elsewhere i.e. GQ, etc.) because it's the only semi-NUDE photo there is of Levi Johnston and since this is about Levi Johnston posing NUDE at Playgirl.com, it's shown as a 'teaser' for the Playgirl story.   Anything to do with the baby, the baby being nude, etc., is an irrelevant aside.  You screaming drama queens are trying to make a non-topic into a topic!   Levi Johnston may be an animal-killing moron, but I'll be happy just seeing him wave his hairy boner at the camera!   As far as Perez Hilton:  he's further proof that any ordinary, non-talented, self-promoting, pig-faced hack can get his 15 minutes of fame nowadays if he's annoying and obnoxious enough!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: b3atrixkiddo</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4393258</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4393258</guid>
					<description>Proof that the apple stem doesn't sprout too far from the branch of the fruit tree ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proof that the apple stem doesn't sprout too far from the branch of the fruit tree &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: ImmortalBeloved</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4391330</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4391330</guid>
					<description>This is so gross to me. Have some pride! Disgusting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so gross to me. Have some pride! Disgusting!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Megan Fox Before Nose and Lip Surgery</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4390677</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4390677</guid>
					<description>adorable baby. fat and cute. but ummm. isn't that wrong to have a nude baby's pic on the web? wtf is wrong with GQ mag?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adorable baby. fat and cute. but ummm. isn't that wrong to have a nude baby's pic on the web? wtf is wrong with GQ mag?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: andriiiiia</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389689</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389689</guid>
					<description>this was announced like a month ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this was announced like a month ago?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: coolkidzftw</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389566</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389566</guid>
					<description>This picture is disgusting. Seriously. =/ 
New lows, much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This picture is disgusting. Seriously. =/<br />
New lows, much?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: oleander22</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389296</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389296</guid>
					<description>That poor, poor child. When he grows up he will know that daddy let the whole world see his private parts. He will probably grow up with his classmates googling it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That poor, poor child. When he grows up he will know that daddy let the whole world see his private parts. He will probably grow up with his classmates googling it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Spaznatic_female</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389138</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389138</guid>
					<description>Oh and btw at least he didnt lay the baby directly on the hotel bedding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and btw at least he didnt lay the baby directly on the hotel bedding.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Spaznatic_female</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389135</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389135</guid>
					<description>[re=4386964]Re: cheesewiz77[/re]  Oh boy you really got me there;) Although I still look at it as a bit of taunting sarcasm.
Did you purchase that lap dog yet? 
Bye sugar pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4386964">Re: cheesewiz77</a> &ndash;   Oh boy you really got me there;) Although I still look at it as a bit of taunting sarcasm.<br />
Did you purchase that lap dog yet?<br />
Bye sugar pie.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: HeartsContent</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389001</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-07-levi-hawtston-definitely-posing-for-playgirl#comment-4389001</guid>
					<description>I agree with most of the ppl in here...why the hell is a pic of his nude child on here. Thats decent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the ppl in here&#8230;why the hell is a pic of his nude child on here. Thats decent.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
