<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whoopi Is Not Impressed With Suzanne Somers</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: greeningreeneNY</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4344230</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4344230</guid>
					<description>Im with suzanne somers, - a Gerson Diet works for many, many ppl.
watch Beautiful Truth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im with suzanne somers, - a Gerson Diet works for many, many ppl.<br />
watch Beautiful Truth
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: contrarianchick</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4343718</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4343718</guid>
					<description>LOL! Patrick did everything to stay healthy! LOL! He was a chain smoker, and he had a serious alcohol problem until 10 years ago. Pancreas no like dat shit.

Whoopi Goldberg, yep, role model for holistic living!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! Patrick did everything to stay healthy! LOL! He was a chain smoker, and he had a serious alcohol problem until 10 years ago. Pancreas no like dat shit.</p>
<p>Whoopi Goldberg, yep, role model for holistic living!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: RHONYC</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4343189</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4343189</guid>
					<description>horse crap!
everyone is allowed their opinion. 
i'm sure plenty of people (u included, pretzels) have said even MORE off-color, opinionated comments at the passing of m.j. (amongst friends, of course).
suzanne seems like a very sensitive and loving person (of what i saw of her on 'the d-list' and i don't think she meant any harm. 
she's on that whole holistic-health trip and wants to save everyone. my mom's the same way.
it's just crappy that a snake reporter took her comments to press without her consent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>horse crap!<br />
everyone is allowed their opinion.<br />
i'm sure plenty of people (u included, pretzels) have said even MORE off-color, opinionated comments at the passing of m.j. (amongst friends, of course).<br />
suzanne seems like a very sensitive and loving person (of what i saw of her on 'the d-list' and i don't think she meant any harm.<br />
she's on that whole holistic-health trip and wants to save everyone. my mom's the same way.<br />
it's just crappy that a snake reporter took her comments to press without her consent.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: urdumb</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4343121</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4343121</guid>
					<description>why? cause big brother's watching? soon the liberals will make it against the law to think your own opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why? cause big brother's watching? soon the liberals will make it against the law to think your own opinion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: pj88</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4343088</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4343088</guid>
					<description>Lay off on Suzanne... she is entitled to her opinions and shouldn't be attacked for saying so.
RIP Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lay off on Suzanne&#8230; she is entitled to her opinions and shouldn't be attacked for saying so.<br />
RIP Patrick
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: seattleLarry</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342964</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342964</guid>
					<description>Also, that fat cow oprah is just trying to rake in more money by being an attention whore.
Somers can say whatever she damn well wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, that fat cow oprah is just trying to rake in more money by being an attention whore.<br />
Somers can say whatever she damn well wants.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: seattleLarry</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342963</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342963</guid>
					<description>Suzanne was not insensitive.  This is:
Patrick Swayze was a dork for using TOBACCO during the last MANY months that he could have tried to fight back for his health.  Tobacco is a pathetic product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suzanne was not insensitive.  This is:<br />
Patrick Swayze was a dork for using TOBACCO during the last MANY months that he could have tried to fight back for his health.  Tobacco is a pathetic product.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: kusiki</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342903</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342903</guid>
					<description>She did say "- I hate to be controversial, but I have to speak out." If the quote is incorrect that's one thing, but it sounds like a public statement. Just saying. Who cares really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She did say "- I hate to be controversial, but I have to speak out." If the quote is incorrect that's one thing, but it sounds like a public statement. Just saying. Who cares really.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: blsdjan</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342600</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342600</guid>
					<description>The reporter is the ASS.  I will never have chemo if I get cancer. I have seen it kill too many of my friend.  It is painful and they still die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reporter is the ASS.  I will never have chemo if I get cancer. I have seen it kill too many of my friend.  It is painful and they still die.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: alexista</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342372</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-23-whoopi-is-not-impressed-with-suzanne-somers#comment-4342372</guid>
					<description>I really didn't agree with Suzanne's statement about Patrick. But if what she's saying is true, it's not her fault because the person "interviewing" her didn't identify himself as a reporter. It sounds like if she'd have known the person she was talking to was a reporter, she would have kept her controversial comments to herself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really didn't agree with Suzanne's statement about Patrick. But if what she's saying is true, it's not her fault because the person "interviewing" her didn't identify himself as a reporter. It sounds like if she'd have known the person she was talking to was a reporter, she would have kept her controversial comments to herself.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
