Comments on: Michael Jackson DEFINITELY NOT The Biological Father!

by: christawc

Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:57:01 +0000

perez…get a real job. 'will i am' didn't hit you', and stop trying to make money off a father that deeply cared about his children. seriously, how can you sleep at night?

by: Lenky Penky

Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:46:31 +0000

Hmm, why did Debbie Rowe lied then? She did this interview (a wee while ago), which you can see on Youtube, and she confirmed that the Jackson was a bio father, and they have had sex to conceive the kids.
Lies, after lies coming out, why are people such liars?
xxx

by: lindycat

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:47:32 +0000

Whether Michael is actually the kids' biological parent or not, I think he was a much better father to them than his own father ever was to him. Michael didn't want to be anything like Joe Jackson - who he left out of his will - and treated his kids like he must have wished Joe had treated him. I wish he could have lived to see them grow up. Rest in peace, King of Pop.

by: lindycat

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:00:43 +0000

I thought that Michael said that he was the sperm donor and the biological father of all three of his kids during the interview he did with Martin Bashear of ABC news some time ago. He also claimed that he and Debbie Rowe conceived their children in "the old-fashioned way'. Then she recently stated that they never had sex, or even slept in the same bed with each other. So now I'm confused. But those kids look like they are white, and not bi-racial as their dad claimed in the interview. The youngest child, whose nickname is 'Blanket' has long, straight black hair - and is in serous need of a haircut. The other two siblings also look too white for them to be Michael's biological children. If they were, then you would think that at least one of them would look something like him.

by: IHateVictoriaBeckham

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:15:40 +0000

This makes no difference! If you adopt a baby in the normal way and then die while that baby is still a child does he/she get returned to their birth mother?? No - they get to remain with the family (in most cases the only family) they have ever grown up in because they are a part of them whether by birth or not.

by: anishka

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:03:28 +0000

who cares who the bloody hell the parents are.. the point is they were with him all their lives..so as far as im concerned michael jackson is their father and thats tt.. i dun get why everyone is soo panicky bout who the so called real parents are.. god.. give it a rest.. idiots

by: SerenityFair

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:12:03 +0000

Re: OBAMA 08 – Amen. RIP Michael

by: Alfavil

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:37:35 +0000

So, Michael Jackson BOUGHT his children! How disgusting can you get?

by: Anticelebrity

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:24:32 +0000

How the hell do you explain all that to those kids who have already been brought in a wierd sheltered way?
Michael probably just thought that stalks bring babies, whilst his aids arranged/paid for the kids. Sad.

by: monkeylove

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:26:14 +0000

CALLING WILL IAMS MANAGER…PLEASE BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF MARIO JUST ONE MORE TIME,,, PLEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZZE KNOCK SOME SENSE INTO HIS FAT HEAD PLEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZEEEEEEE