http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued Perez Hilton Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:08:41 +0000 Perezhilton.com http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3974428 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:00:34 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3974428 I can't stand this no talent, bitch, reality show loser............I wish she would just go the fuck away!!!! I can't stand this no talent, bitch, reality show loser…………I wish she would just go the fuck away!!!!

]]> http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3969903 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:11:10 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3969903 Wow. I'm no lawyer, and I certainly won't be the judge in the case, but when reading the letter, I was amazed to see that BOTH books apparently share the same misspelling -- both books used "isle" instead of "aisle" to mean "supermarket aisle"; but "isle" is short for "island." If that wasn't just an error in the letter, and if I were the judge, I'd be taking a hard, HARD look at that similarity -- especially since since Hassett's book was self-published (some typos and minor errors are expected in a self-pubbed book), and Elizabeth Hasselbeck's was published by a major commercial publisher -- meaning it would have been (should have been) carefully edited several times before publication, so should have contained few or no errors. But yet, that *particular *identical error appears in the big-name-published book. And then there's the "similar chapter titles" jolt to consider. Personal opinion? I think Elizabeth Hasselbeck's attorney is going to have to work a little harder than for most celebrity authors to prove "no plagiarism." Wow. I'm no lawyer, and I certainly won't be the judge in the case, but when reading the letter, I was amazed to see that BOTH books apparently share the same misspelling — both books used "isle" instead of "aisle" to mean "supermarket aisle"; but "isle" is short for "island." If that wasn't just an error in the letter, and if I were the judge, I'd be taking a hard, HARD look at that similarity — especially since since Hassett's book was self-published (some typos and minor errors are expected in a self-pubbed book), and Elizabeth Hasselbeck's was published by a major commercial publisher — meaning it would have been (should have been) carefully edited several times before publication, so should have contained few or no errors. But yet, that *particular *identical error appears in the big-name-published book. And then there's the "similar chapter titles" jolt to consider. Personal opinion? I think Elizabeth Hasselbeck's attorney is going to have to work a little harder than for most celebrity authors to prove "no plagiarism."

]]> http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3965184 Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:04:27 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3965184 she's a beeyoach to the max and now a plagiarist one. she's a beeyoach to the max and now a plagiarist one.

]]> http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3964917 Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:54:57 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3964917 ElizaBITCH did it, she would def. take credit for someone elese's work. You think that ElizaBITCH wouldn't do something so slimy, shes a fucking republican what do u expect of such scum lol.....If this is a true statement she should get sued. GOD BLESS AMERICA LAND OF THE UNLIMITED SUING. ElizaBITCH did it, she would def. take credit for someone elese's work. You think that ElizaBITCH wouldn't do something so slimy, shes a fucking republican what do u expect of such scum lol…..If this is a true statement she should get sued. GOD BLESS AMERICA LAND OF THE UNLIMITED SUING.

]]> http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3960739 Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:40:31 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3960739 Sad little worthless twat! Shes a terrible person. Sad little worthless twat! Shes a terrible person.

]]> http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3960409 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:48:11 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3960409 she practically lifted from hassett's book word for word....she's a thief and a liar. she practically lifted from hassett's book word for word….she's a thief and a liar.

]]> http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3958543 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:02:27 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3958543 technically Hasselbeck isn't in the "wrong" The woman has no grounds to sue. For one, you would need a copyright on the material in order to say it was stolen. And two, you CANNOT copyright an IDEA. technically Hasselbeck isn't in the "wrong"
The woman has no grounds to sue.
For one, you would need a copyright on the material in order to say it was stolen.
And two, you CANNOT copyright an IDEA.

]]> http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3958311 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:40:29 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3958311 Good I hope that woman gets a huge chunk of Elizabitch's money Good I hope that woman gets a huge chunk of Elizabitch's money

]]> http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3957853 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:43:27 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3957853 Watch Perezzzzzeeeee. Hasselbeck is a tough chick, she just may slap the other side of your cum-sucking face. Watch Perezzzzzeeeee. Hasselbeck is a tough chick, she just may slap the other side of your cum-sucking face.

]]> http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3957691 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:25:09 +0000 http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-23-hasselbeck-sued#comment-3957691 Suck it cyberbullying is fun. Suck it cyberbullying is fun.

]]>