<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Winehouse vs Duffy</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: chuckiidee</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3867193</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3867193</guid>
					<description>duffy all the way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>duffy all the way
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Sparkalee</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3843872</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3843872</guid>
					<description>Duffy...but A. WHinnerhouse does have that bad ass image that would fit a 007 movie...Make her a bad girl instead of singing, kill her off in the first 15 min....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duffy&#8230;but A. WHinnerhouse does have that bad ass image that would fit a 007 movie&#8230;Make her a bad girl instead of singing, kill her off in the first 15 min&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Ichigo</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3832375</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3832375</guid>
					<description>Amy for fuck sake!!!!!!! She is the queen, she has the perfect voice, no fucking Duffy....!!!!! &#62;_</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy for fuck sake!!!!!!! She is the queen, she has the perfect voice, no fucking Duffy&#8230;.!!!!! &gt;_
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: wizzmaster</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3825073</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3825073</guid>
					<description>Definitely both are awesome, but wino's unpredictable!!! i think they will go for the safest choice...Duffy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely both are awesome, but wino's unpredictable!!! i think they will go for the safest choice&#8230;Duffy!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: LolliBean</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3824914</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 06:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3824914</guid>
					<description>if winehouse got her shit together, she could kill duffy in a heartbeat. she has that sultry 007-ish jazzy tone, duffy sounds annoying sometimes, but since shes still a crackhead with crunchy, 3 day old eyeliner, duffy definitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if winehouse got her shit together, she could kill duffy in a heartbeat. she has that sultry 007-ish jazzy tone, duffy sounds annoying sometimes, but since shes still a crackhead with crunchy, 3 day old eyeliner, duffy definitely.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Helen Tarnation</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3824287</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 23:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3824287</guid>
					<description>Adele.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adele.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: delfi.</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3824154</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3824154</guid>
					<description>definitely amy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely amy!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: nemorous</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3823749</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 19:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3823749</guid>
					<description>Duffy deserves it.

Amy Winehouse probably has the vocal chords of a 90 year old after all that crack smoking.  Too bad.  She really had something, now she's a loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duffy deserves it.</p>
<p>Amy Winehouse probably has the vocal chords of a 90 year old after all that crack smoking.  Too bad.  She really had something, now she's a loser.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: arlectronic</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3823662</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3823662</guid>
					<description>Wino! Duffy is too plain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wino! Duffy is too plain.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: ninagibson</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3823653</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-23-winehouse-vs-duffy#comment-3823653</guid>
					<description>i think amy should get it, but duffy will, because she isn't fucked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think amy should get it, but duffy will, because she isn't fucked up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
