<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is Not Necessary!</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: starmix18</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3630605</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3630605</guid>
					<description>[re=3627883]Re: Skyblacker[/re] Thanks for the info. I think you're right about the cameo idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627883">Re: Skyblacker</a> &ndash;  Thanks for the info. I think you're right about the cameo idea.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Skyblacker</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627883</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627883</guid>
					<description>[re=3625296]Re: starmix18[/re] While Michael J. Fox probably lacks the stamina to star in an action movie like BTTF IV, I'd be surprised if he didn't at least do a cameo. (the fans would demand it) He could even play a role throughout the movie if it wasn't too physically demanding (perhaps a character who's often seen sitting).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3625296">Re: starmix18</a> &ndash;  While Michael J. Fox probably lacks the stamina to star in an action movie like BTTF IV, I'd be surprised if he didn't at least do a cameo. (the fans would demand it) He could even play a role throughout the movie if it wasn't too physically demanding (perhaps a character who's often seen sitting).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Skyblacker</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627863</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627863</guid>
					<description>[re=3625296]Re: starmix18[/re] There have been rumors about Back to the Future IV, but nothing's gone beyond the screenplay stage. That said, the general idea is that BTTF IV would follow Doc but not Marty. 

Remember, at the end of BTTF III, Doc has has a time-travelling train while Marty has nothing but the wreckage of the Delorian. So any sequel would be more likely to involve Doc (and maybe the children he briefly introduces -- grown now?) than Marty. 

Personally, I'm just wondering if the producers are waiting until 2015. Who needs hoverboards when you have iPhones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3625296">Re: starmix18</a> &ndash;  There have been rumors about Back to the Future IV, but nothing's gone beyond the screenplay stage. That said, the general idea is that BTTF IV would follow Doc but not Marty. </p>
<p>Remember, at the end of BTTF III, Doc has has a time-travelling train while Marty has nothing but the wreckage of the Delorian. So any sequel would be more likely to involve Doc (and maybe the children he briefly introduces &#8212; grown now?) than Marty. </p>
<p>Personally, I'm just wondering if the producers are waiting until 2015. Who needs hoverboards when you have iPhones?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: COCACOLA</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627764</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627764</guid>
					<description>LOVEEEEEEE MEN IN BLACK.......AT LEAST A REMAKE IN HOLLYWOOD THAT MAKE SENSE.....LOVE THE ILEANS, THE FUNK AND THE CHEMISTRY BETWEEN
THESE TWO.-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOVEEEEEEE MEN IN BLACK&#8230;&#8230;.AT LEAST A REMAKE IN HOLLYWOOD THAT MAKE SENSE&#8230;..LOVE THE ILEANS, THE FUNK AND THE CHEMISTRY BETWEEN<br />
THESE TWO.-
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: allygirl08</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627446</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627446</guid>
					<description>almost as gay as the new fast and furious!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>almost as gay as the new fast and furious!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: AmbrosiaRose</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627171</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627171</guid>
					<description>They could put Will Smith in a shit suit and stupid people will go see him in droves. These are the type of movies that make the most  money, not the ones that you actually have to ACT in.  It's what society has come to. Will Smith needs some more money for Scientology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could put Will Smith in a shit suit and stupid people will go see him in droves. These are the type of movies that make the most  money, not the ones that you actually have to ACT in.  It's what society has come to. Will Smith needs some more money for Scientology.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: somethingbode</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627106</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3627106</guid>
					<description>NO. STAY AWAY FROM GHOSTBUSTERS AND BACK TO THE FUTURE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO. STAY AWAY FROM GHOSTBUSTERS AND BACK TO THE FUTURE.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: anne jugsten</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3626363</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3626363</guid>
					<description>baaaack to the future 4 *___*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>baaaack to the future 4 *___*
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: enjoythesilence</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3626234</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3626234</guid>
					<description>Oh why not? I could use some fun mindless fluff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh why not? I could use some fun mindless fluff.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: dena al</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3626212</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-02-this-is-not-necessary#comment-3626212</guid>
					<description>blah----straight to dvd bullshit-  i saw 1000 copies of part two sitting on the shelf of the 99 cent store----shit franchise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blah&#8212;-straight to dvd bullshit-  i saw 1000 copies of part two sitting on the shelf of the 99 cent store&#8212;-shit franchise
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
