<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is That Teddy Hilton???</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: kikicatlet</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3547273</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3547273</guid>
					<description>I AM JUST STUNNED THAT THEY PUT

A HOMEWRECKER POSED AS THE FIRST LADY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I AM JUST STUNNED THAT THEY PUT</p>
<p>A HOMEWRECKER POSED AS THE FIRST LADY.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: blueberrychardonnay</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3528142</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3528142</guid>
					<description>lady gaga is the new madonna god!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lady gaga is the new madonna god!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: The Mancunian Candidate</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3527460</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3527460</guid>
					<description>i went on the link and i havent even heard of the majority of the american icons. and that rumer girl perez hates was posing as one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i went on the link and i havent even heard of the majority of the american icons. and that rumer girl perez hates was posing as one!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: The Mancunian Candidate</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3527420</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3527420</guid>
					<description>cute</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cute
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: ALFREDOXO</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526914</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526914</guid>
					<description>LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Crep&amp;#250!!!SEMICOLON!!!sculo&lt;3</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526786</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526786</guid>
					<description>cute dog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cute dog
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Fuego</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526556</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526556</guid>
					<description>[re=3523967]Re: misopretty[/re] um... actually an apostrophe denotes possessive not plural. But I'm sure that's why I'm the idiot. 
And I'm just saying it's way lamer to love the Olsens than the first fam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3523967">Re: misopretty</a> &ndash;  um&#8230; actually an apostrophe denotes possessive not plural. But I'm sure that's why I'm the idiot.<br />
And I'm just saying it's way lamer to love the Olsens than the first fam.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Failkips</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526292</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526292</guid>
					<description>Shut up Mario, you're just jealous that Lindsay Lohan has more amazing and wonderful breasts than you ever will, no matter how many ho-hos and donuts you stuff in your gaping maw.  Stick to dongs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shut up Mario, you're just jealous that Lindsay Lohan has more amazing and wonderful breasts than you ever will, no matter how many ho-hos and donuts you stuff in your gaping maw.  Stick to dongs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Sadie-Say</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526036</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3526036</guid>
					<description>Linsday looks fantastic! It makes you realize how pudgy and short Madonna is... Lindsay's long legs and arms make this look beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linsday looks fantastic! It makes you realize how pudgy and short Madonna is&#8230; Lindsay's long legs and arms make this look beautiful.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: BRATZ</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3525808</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2009-03-04-is-that-teddy-hilton#comment-3525808</guid>
					<description>Why is Lindsay Lohan constantly doing photo spreads? She hasn't done anything lately that I would even think to call her for a photo shoot. When her pregnant movie comes out, then that will be a reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Lindsay Lohan constantly doing photo spreads? She hasn't done anything lately that I would even think to call her for a photo shoot. When her pregnant movie comes out, then that will be a reason.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
