<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Twilight Effect</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: Mayra</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3193509</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3193509</guid>
					<description>





ha ha ha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
ha ha ha
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: soccerchick26</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3148059</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3148059</guid>
					<description>oh shut up perez. just because she is mormon doesn't mean shes for prop 8. You are worse than the people that you make fun of. GROW UP PEREZ. please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh shut up perez. just because she is mormon doesn't mean shes for prop 8. You are worse than the people that you make fun of. GROW UP PEREZ. please.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Superbad13</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3147704</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3147704</guid>
					<description>[re=3143660]Re: cullencrazy[/re] Ha I'm glad someone agrees with me. And yeah that hospital scene...whoa. And the scene when they  are in the woods and she's telling him what she thinks he is, I read that the only reason the camera is swirling around them so much is BECAUSE she lacks emotional range and due to her ability to only show the emotions "blank and blanker" that's why they do so many close ups on her, to make the scene more intense because she can't. It's good to know that you would agree that maybe a casting session should be held for a new bella for the next movies. Baseball scene was badass, no? and Rosalie and emett...no the cullens were so great i loved them. Charlie and  jacob were good too. I'm interested to see how Taylor lautner does in the next one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3143660">Re: cullencrazy</a> &ndash;  Ha I'm glad someone agrees with me. And yeah that hospital scene&#8230;whoa. And the scene when they  are in the woods and she's telling him what she thinks he is, I read that the only reason the camera is swirling around them so much is BECAUSE she lacks emotional range and due to her ability to only show the emotions "blank and blanker" that's why they do so many close ups on her, to make the scene more intense because she can't. It's good to know that you would agree that maybe a casting session should be held for a new bella for the next movies. Baseball scene was badass, no? and Rosalie and emett&#8230;no the cullens were so great i loved them. Charlie and  jacob were good too. I'm interested to see how Taylor lautner does in the next one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: CONNIE71</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3146435</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3146435</guid>
					<description>robert pattinson is NOT ATTRACTIVE he looks like he has downs syndrome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>robert pattinson is NOT ATTRACTIVE he looks like he has downs syndrome
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: XxPixieDustxX</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3146163</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3146163</guid>
					<description>I really hope they find a new director for the next one- or they need to put a LOT more money into it and Catherine really needs to explain everything she left out in the first one. What I don't understand is why she had to change the scenes so much, for example- I didn't like how Bella met Jacob in the movie.. I guess she needs to understand that the fans supporting these movies are DIEHARD fans of the book and they really want to see the complete book come to life the way they imagined. The next movie needs to be a lot longer aswell. But, overall, I really liked the movie and I'll be seeing it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope they find a new director for the next one- or they need to put a LOT more money into it and Catherine really needs to explain everything she left out in the first one. What I don't understand is why she had to change the scenes so much, for example- I didn't like how Bella met Jacob in the movie.. I guess she needs to understand that the fans supporting these movies are DIEHARD fans of the book and they really want to see the complete book come to life the way they imagined. The next movie needs to be a lot longer aswell. But, overall, I really liked the movie and I'll be seeing it again.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: XxPixieDustxX</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3146162</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3146162</guid>
					<description>Meh, I just got back from the movie. I loved the movie, you just can't really compare it to the book if you plan on enjoying it (which is what I was doing in the first 30 minutes or so, and I found myself disappointed). I wasn't really happy when they chose Catherine Hardwicke as a director to begin with, don't get me wrong, she looks like an awesome woman but I've never been a fan of her movies. They're too choppy and slow, and she seems to put Nikki Reed (Rosalie) in every one of them. I wish they would've developed the characters more, and she really needed to stick to the book more as far as their personallities go (for example, Angela was supposed to be timid, and Mike was supposed to follow Bella around like a dog, and Jessica was supposed to be more annoying/jealous), and I loved Rob but Edward was supposed to speak like a gentleman and it was supposed to be obvious. He didn't seem to speak much different than Bella did. It's like Catherine assumed EVERYONE who was going to see the movie had read the books (I went with my mom, who hasn't read them yet and she enjoyed it but got a bit lost).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, I just got back from the movie. I loved the movie, you just can't really compare it to the book if you plan on enjoying it (which is what I was doing in the first 30 minutes or so, and I found myself disappointed). I wasn't really happy when they chose Catherine Hardwicke as a director to begin with, don't get me wrong, she looks like an awesome woman but I've never been a fan of her movies. They're too choppy and slow, and she seems to put Nikki Reed (Rosalie) in every one of them. I wish they would've developed the characters more, and she really needed to stick to the book more as far as their personallities go (for example, Angela was supposed to be timid, and Mike was supposed to follow Bella around like a dog, and Jessica was supposed to be more annoying/jealous), and I loved Rob but Edward was supposed to speak like a gentleman and it was supposed to be obvious. He didn't seem to speak much different than Bella did. It's like Catherine assumed EVERYONE who was going to see the movie had read the books (I went with my mom, who hasn't read them yet and she enjoyed it but got a bit lost).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: mormonpride</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3146130</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3146130</guid>
					<description>Hey fuck ass Perez! why didn't you donate any money to your cause? There is alot of big time celebs in California who are pro gay marriage and they did not pitch a dime to this cause. put your money where your mouth is hater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey fuck ass Perez! why didn't you donate any money to your cause? There is alot of big time celebs in California who are pro gay marriage and they did not pitch a dime to this cause. put your money where your mouth is hater.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: hp_heartt</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3145917</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3145917</guid>
					<description>He is so fucking hot!
But, I wont see Twilight.
Harry Potter forever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is so fucking hot!<br />
But, I wont see Twilight.<br />
Harry Potter forever!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: canadian1988</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3145702</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3145702</guid>
					<description>[re=3143506]Re: HottStuff[/re] Alright go fuck yourself...I am not a 15 year old with no brain and I LOVED every book in the Twilight series! Anyone I know who has read them, loved them and we range from 19-30 and are almost all university educated...
Yes the writing may not be the best ever but it's a beautiful unique love story and I've read tonnes of books, 15 just this summer and they are not all Chick Lit books either but range from Wuthering Heights to Night to Cormac McCarthy's The Road. 
So HottStuff...take your own damn advice and get a life :)
Love Always,
A 20 year old with a 3.7 GPA, a life thank you very much and a great love for the romance of Edward and Bella in the Twilight BOOKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3143506">Re: HottStuff</a> &ndash;  Alright go fuck yourself&#8230;I am not a 15 year old with no brain and I LOVED every book in the Twilight series! Anyone I know who has read them, loved them and we range from 19-30 and are almost all university educated&#8230;<br />
Yes the writing may not be the best ever but it's a beautiful unique love story and I've read tonnes of books, 15 just this summer and they are not all Chick Lit books either but range from Wuthering Heights to Night to Cormac McCarthy's The Road.<br />
So HottStuff&#8230;take your own damn advice and get a life <img src='http://perezhilton.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Love Always,<br />
A 20 year old with a 3.7 GPA, a life thank you very much and a great love for the romance of Edward and Bella in the Twilight BOOKS!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: lizzy46_soccer</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3145602</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-11-21-the-twilight-effect#comment-3145602</guid>
					<description>Are you fucking kidding me Perez?
Breaking Dawn sold 1.3 million in its first day of release in the US. Um, didn't Deathly Hallows sell 8.3 million on its first day in the US? Check your facts.

And a bigger audience? Now that's a joke. Last time I checked, an audience of people ranging from the ages of 9 to 69 (both male and female) is MUCH larger than that of girls between 12 and 18. 

Do you even bother to look at the numbers before running your mouth? Clearly not. 

For the record:
I'm a HP fan and a Twilight fan.
But you're a dumbass if you think Meyer's work even touches the ground Rowling is on. Twilight will be forgotten in years time. After the last of the movies [because those idiots at Summit now have the rights to the rest of the series] the books themselves will fade in popularity. People will stop caring about them. There's nothing meaningful throughout the entire series to keep it alive and loved through time.

Potter, on the other hand, is alive and well after ten years. And guess what? It will continue to be. It's a classic; up there with Frodo and Narnia. It has themes and universal appeal. And and MUCH larger fandom base. 

Now get this shit out of here and acknowledge your ignorance, fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you fucking kidding me Perez?<br />
Breaking Dawn sold 1.3 million in its first day of release in the US. Um, didn't Deathly Hallows sell 8.3 million on its first day in the US? Check your facts.</p>
<p>And a bigger audience? Now that's a joke. Last time I checked, an audience of people ranging from the ages of 9 to 69 (both male and female) is MUCH larger than that of girls between 12 and 18. </p>
<p>Do you even bother to look at the numbers before running your mouth? Clearly not. </p>
<p>For the record:<br />
I'm a HP fan and a Twilight fan.<br />
But you're a dumbass if you think Meyer's work even touches the ground Rowling is on. Twilight will be forgotten in years time. After the last of the movies [because those idiots at Summit now have the rights to the rest of the series] the books themselves will fade in popularity. People will stop caring about them. There's nothing meaningful throughout the entire series to keep it alive and loved through time.</p>
<p>Potter, on the other hand, is alive and well after ten years. And guess what? It will continue to be. It's a classic; up there with Frodo and Narnia. It has themes and universal appeal. And and MUCH larger fandom base. </p>
<p>Now get this shit out of here and acknowledge your ignorance, fool.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
