Comments on: Google vs. Wikipedia: It's War!

by: Nosy

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:24:27 +0000

Mmmmm but Wiki tends to be ridiculously inaccurate, with its "everyone's two cents" content. Go Google.

by: pimp

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:20:16 +0000

who this story is even gayer than the one with the ded lil boy
>:)

by: brown

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:55:22 +0000

Re: Braill12 – Re: Matt –
agreed. Learning from unchecked resources, or "works in progress," is totally counterproductive. like reading perez.

by: Nick

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:13:44 +0000

What kind of keyboard is that?

by: Obama

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:10:47 +0000

Only the uneducated and high school losers use Wikipedia as an information source. Intelligent people know it is 100% totally unreliable in it's facts. OF course, this is where the Obamatrons get their information and that's why Obama looks like such a moron during many of his speeches.

by: itsonlyme

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:57:30 +0000

I use wiki and imbd. There are some things that bother me about knol…..such as the inability for the owners to delete comments. What if they are abusive, slanderous or false statements? Would the person/estate/organization, on which the page is based on, be able to sue the owner for slander or defamation of character? Would Google be offering legal representatives for the owners?

I will stick with wiki and imbd…they have yet to lead me astray.

by: long

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:36:35 +0000

Wikipedia is independent and awesome.
Google is not. It's all about the $$$$$$, as always.
I use WIKI anytime I'm researching something. I'm not about to change that b/c Google tries to copy. Losers.

by: john

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:02:49 +0000

google's gettin' greedy

by: Jules :3

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:58:24 +0000

by: Lily

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:25:59 +0000

bullshit. Wikipedia will always win.