Comments on: Why Sunday?

by: James

Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:25:40 +0000

You utter LOSER! We all know you totally stole 'Sunday Roast' from the Australian media who have been using it from the get-go! Trying to claim it as your own is just POOR taste!!!

by: e

Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:57:46 +0000

Re: March –

Yeah she will shoot a movie soon i don't think she was really pregnant anyway.

by: e

Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:57:14 +0000

Re: March –

Yeah she will shoot a movie soon i don't think she was really pregnant anyway?

by: oi_au

Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:39:59 +0000

Oh btw apparently as was done with their wedding pic, one pic will be released of Sunday Rose through media magnate Rupert Murdoch and donations to charity will be asked.

by: oi_au

Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:36:04 +0000

Re: March – Hmmm so in your eyes father's are allowed to go to work but mother's must look after their kids, stay home and never work. What planet did you come you as you seriously need a reality check. Does that mean that all working mothers who return to work and have family or nanny's or child care for their children are just bitches? It doesn't matter if a person supposedly has 'money' , some women in order to keep their career's going have to return to work. This can range from women who are lawyers, Doctors, Nurses, Waitresses, Shop Assistants and of course Actresses. Studies have proven that working mothers do not emotionally affect a child. I am sure that between Nicole and Keith they will ensure like most loving couples that their child's needs will be attended to.

by: March

Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:17:11 +0000

I just read that the bitch is already handing the kid over to her mother (and then a nanny) so that she can go off and ruin a few more good movies, that then nobodys gonna wanna watch. She's already got 2 films lined up - one shooting in 8 weeks time! For years and years she dined out on all that shit about wanting a kid so badly and then she gets one, for what? So that it can be raised by a nanny while Nicole continues with her lousy accents and wooden bad-acting… What a crock of shit! Should have just called the poor baby, 'Publicity plan No. 897'

by: oi_au

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:37:42 +0000

Re: zd – Ummm we claim Keith as our own but he is a Kiwi and Nicole was actually born in Hawaii. As for not being born in Australia - the media harassed both Nicole and Keith they had to leave. Originally it appeared Nicole would give birth in Sydney at the same hospital where her sister gave birth 4 times, however journalists wrecked that plan with attempting to get hold of medical files, staff leaks and room locations that could possibly help them get first pictures. Us bloddy aussies have terrible snooping journalists that tend to pverstep the mark such as leaving tiny cameras around in hidden places - isn't that right J???? I know you are reading this J…….so thanks for 'stalking' our celebrities really makes them want to stay in Australia when they are so safe and allowed to live in privacy.

by: Jibbe

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:55:26 +0000

Re: sam – Good point…

by: Jibbe

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:53:03 +0000

How could you add crazy Cruise on the name?!?! The best thing Nicole ever did was walk away from the "Starship Enterprise", I mean, Tom Cruise.

by: zd

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:28:41 +0000

Re: ? –
Yeah i also wonder why they didn't have the child in Australia..
I thought she was sooooooooo proud to be Australian?
Well i guess not really.