<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Unprofessional!</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
				<title>by: trini</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2462452</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2462452</guid>
					<description>fuck perez fuckin chi chi man 
boom bye bye inna batty bwoy head!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuck perez fuckin chi chi man<br />
boom bye bye inna batty bwoy head!!!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: apple</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2460058</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2460058</guid>
					<description>Leave him alone, get a life and stop acting like 'The Insider's Pat O Brien'. Who thinks he knows-it-alll and knows nothing. Man! a 16 year old is much mature than u r. 
Ed Norton's acting rocks and your words mean NOTHING infront of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave him alone, get a life and stop acting like 'The Insider's Pat O Brien'. Who thinks he knows-it-alll and knows nothing. Man! a 16 year old is much mature than u r.<br />
Ed Norton's acting rocks and your words mean NOTHING infront of him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Vic</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2411104</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2411104</guid>
					<description>The reason my main man RDJ shows up is the same reason Samuel Jackson shows up in Iron Man: Marvel is planning an epic Avengers movie, combining all the smaller superhero movies into one huge amazing blockbuster. and the Hulk has got nothing on Ironman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason my main man RDJ shows up is the same reason Samuel Jackson shows up in Iron Man: Marvel is planning an epic Avengers movie, combining all the smaller superhero movies into one huge amazing blockbuster. and the Hulk has got nothing on Ironman.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Bman</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2397543</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2397543</guid>
					<description>[re=2396295]Re: Maz[/re] 

bahahhahaha Justice League is DC comics

The Avengers is 2011, with Iron man2 and Captain America before the premier of The Avengers (maybe hulk). After that Thor will have his own movie (now im skeptical on that)

regardless, they already decided that if hulk wasn't going to be in it, he could appear as apart of it (CGI only anyone?). Nick Fury was already introduced and doesn't need a movie and same with black widow (even though she was not apart of the normal Avengers team, that would be Antman)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2396295">Re: Maz</a> &ndash;  </p>
<p>bahahhahaha Justice League is DC comics</p>
<p>The Avengers is 2011, with Iron man2 and Captain America before the premier of The Avengers (maybe hulk). After that Thor will have his own movie (now im skeptical on that)</p>
<p>regardless, they already decided that if hulk wasn't going to be in it, he could appear as apart of it (CGI only anyone?). Nick Fury was already introduced and doesn't need a movie and same with black widow (even though she was not apart of the normal Avengers team, that would be Antman)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Maz</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2396295</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2396295</guid>
					<description>they're building up for a justice league movie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they're building up for a justice league movie!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Brie</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2384733</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2384733</guid>
					<description>He did his part in promoting his film.
He's done plenty of promoting via appearances, interviews, and so on.
I think he's done his part.
He got screwed in the writing credits. I'd be angry if I were him too.
I don't think he's been out of line at all.
He's very talented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He did his part in promoting his film.<br />
He's done plenty of promoting via appearances, interviews, and so on.<br />
I think he's done his part.<br />
He got screwed in the writing credits. I'd be angry if I were him too.<br />
I don't think he's been out of line at all.<br />
He's very talented.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: fizzi</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2381221</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2381221</guid>
					<description>And the comic fans would be pretty pissed off by another disappointment, so this movie has to be good if the studio is planning two sequels. I'd be willing to bet that Norton was committed to finally doing the comic books justice. And I don't doubt that he will. As far as not doing press, Norton doesn't need to. His work stands for itself, and most people, even if they aren't particularly brilliant, trust him to not disappoint. And if the studio (money hungry) and Norton (an artist with standards) had enough "creative differences" to make it in the press, I doubt I'd blame Norton for not doing the next two movies. IF that's whats happened. Staying true to your work is more important than money, especially if money isn't a problem. I skimmed through the comments and I really don't think Perez has a chance in Hell of making people believe that Norton is a "diva", or to make fans doubt his character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the comic fans would be pretty pissed off by another disappointment, so this movie has to be good if the studio is planning two sequels. I'd be willing to bet that Norton was committed to finally doing the comic books justice. And I don't doubt that he will. As far as not doing press, Norton doesn't need to. His work stands for itself, and most people, even if they aren't particularly brilliant, trust him to not disappoint. And if the studio (money hungry) and Norton (an artist with standards) had enough "creative differences" to make it in the press, I doubt I'd blame Norton for not doing the next two movies. IF that's whats happened. Staying true to your work is more important than money, especially if money isn't a problem. I skimmed through the comments and I really don't think Perez has a chance in Hell of making people believe that Norton is a "diva", or to make fans doubt his character.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: fizzi</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2381219</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2381219</guid>
					<description>I was actually kind of worried and shocked when I found out Norton was doing "The Hulk". I'm uneducated as far as the comic goes, but from the little I saw of the last Hulk movie, I didn't see how another could possibly be worth making. I worried this would be a bad career move on Norton's part. After being told by friends who are hardcore fans of the comic how excited they were for the upcoming film, I figured they must have heard good things. After reading Perez's post, I'm betting this is actually a pretty good movie. I wouldn't be surprised if Norton was a fan of the comics and that's why he wanted to do the movie. Demanding to help write and tweak the screenplay shows that this is a project that was important to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually kind of worried and shocked when I found out Norton was doing "The Hulk". I'm uneducated as far as the comic goes, but from the little I saw of the last Hulk movie, I didn't see how another could possibly be worth making. I worried this would be a bad career move on Norton's part. After being told by friends who are hardcore fans of the comic how excited they were for the upcoming film, I figured they must have heard good things. After reading Perez's post, I'm betting this is actually a pretty good movie. I wouldn't be surprised if Norton was a fan of the comics and that's why he wanted to do the movie. Demanding to help write and tweak the screenplay shows that this is a project that was important to him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: fizzi</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2381213</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2381213</guid>
					<description>I think Norton is incredibly smart. And I agree he's undervalued as an actor; what works against him is his being a true actor. He never fails to choose an interesting, well-written movie and create an engaging, believable, well-wrought character. He stays about as far away from the paps and the press as possible. The only reason he is famous is because he is smart, talented, and successful. He's focused on his art and not on being famous or exploiting his fame. That's very rare in the entertainment industry these days. I admire him for that about as much I appreciate and enjoy his films. (EVEN Death to Smoochy, which I suspect was widely panned because it's a SMART comedy, and not a lot of people, in this country at least, "do" smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Norton is incredibly smart. And I agree he's undervalued as an actor; what works against him is his being a true actor. He never fails to choose an interesting, well-written movie and create an engaging, believable, well-wrought character. He stays about as far away from the paps and the press as possible. The only reason he is famous is because he is smart, talented, and successful. He's focused on his art and not on being famous or exploiting his fame. That's very rare in the entertainment industry these days. I admire him for that about as much I appreciate and enjoy his films. (EVEN Death to Smoochy, which I suspect was widely panned because it's a SMART comedy, and not a lot of people, in this country at least, "do" smart.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
				<title>by: Alann</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2380330</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2380330</guid>
					<description>[re=2369780]Re: brand[/re] 
I laugh at how unintelligent you seem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-12-edward-norton#comment-2369780">Re: brand</a> &ndash;<br />
I laugh at how unintelligent you seem.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
