<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Denial Denial Denial</title>
	<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart</link>
	<description>Perez Hilton</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>Perezhilton.com</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: pat o</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2395984</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2395984</guid>
					<description>Where are the twins ET?  Perez blast them?  like Mary Hart vetted a source in her life?  PUH-lease</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are the twins ET?  Perez blast them?  like Mary Hart vetted a source in her life?  PUH-lease
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2367891</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2367891</guid>
					<description>JUST ANOTHER OLD, FAT, DESPERATE REPORTER...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JUST ANOTHER OLD, FAT, DESPERATE REPORTER&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2360417</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2360417</guid>
					<description>Did you ever consider that maybe if she did give birth the babies might be in poor condition? If she did give birth, it's extremely early! Maybe they want to keep everything under wraps until the twins are healthy enough to take home. Hopefully this isn't the case and the twins are completely healthy whether they are in or out of the womb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever consider that maybe if she did give birth the babies might be in poor condition? If she did give birth, it's extremely early! Maybe they want to keep everything under wraps until the twins are healthy enough to take home. Hopefully this isn't the case and the twins are completely healthy whether they are in or out of the womb.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roche</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2360306</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2360306</guid>
					<description>Seriously, who cares?  Leave them alone, it's an event just for their family to know of.  Love those people or not, (I'm on the NOT side), I'm sure they aren't calling your homes wanting to know how you're doing or how your family is, so gives a crap about theirs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, who cares?  Leave them alone, it's an event just for their family to know of.  Love those people or not, (I'm on the NOT side), I'm sure they aren't calling your homes wanting to know how you're doing or how your family is, so gives a crap about theirs?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jess</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2360301</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2360301</guid>
					<description>[re=2359800]Re: Beetc[/re] 

They're not  her kids to be concerned over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2359800">Re: Beetc</a> &ndash;  </p>
<p>They're not  her kids to be concerned over.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Giada</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2360298</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2360298</guid>
					<description>Why so much secrecy about her fucking twins?  Where they born joined at the head or something?
Anyway, who fucking cares!?  There are millions of women giving birth every minute, Angelina is just another one so who gives a flying fuck about that anti-American cunt and her bastards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why so much secrecy about her fucking twins?  Where they born joined at the head or something?<br />
Anyway, who fucking cares!?  There are millions of women giving birth every minute, Angelina is just another one so who gives a flying fuck about that anti-American cunt and her bastards?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Beetc</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2359800</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2359800</guid>
					<description>What a Bitch; she hopes the babies were born when they said they were to protect their asses??? Wouldn't that mean the babies were premature??? No, not concerned about the babies at all if that's the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a Bitch; she hopes the babies were born when they said they were to protect their asses??? Wouldn't that mean the babies were premature??? No, not concerned about the babies at all if that's the case.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: to si</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2358870</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2358870</guid>
					<description>It's  interesting what kind of "people" Aniston attracts!
She fed them hate with her pity-old-me parties starting with that VF "article".
There's no bigger publicity HO than Aniston (with pr-queen Huvane)-exposing 
her 40 years old self on a public pool with her son Mayer the Urinator this time around......versus loved-up Angie and Brad in Cannes !
Now go read your tabloids that shamelessly L.I.E. to you over and over and over again about the s.a.me. crap that n.e.v.e.r. happens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's  interesting what kind of "people" Aniston attracts!<br />
She fed them hate with her pity-old-me parties starting with that VF "article".<br />
There's no bigger publicity HO than Aniston (with pr-queen Huvane)-exposing<br />
her 40 years old self on a public pool with her son Mayer the Urinator this time around&#8230;&#8230;versus loved-up Angie and Brad in Cannes !<br />
Now go read your tabloids that shamelessly L.I.E. to you over and over and over again about the s.a.me. crap that n.e.v.e.r. happens!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: S</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2358699</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2358699</guid>
					<description>Anyways, we Know now there was no "home", and a FAKE "goldensh$t couple" (and they by association!) was fabricated by the tabloids (as Maniston said on Oprah's  show - BEFORE 
she decided to ride the J-Ps fame!!) Rotten! 
at the same time Maniston  was 
"friendly" f-ing V.V,  making  a laughingstock out of him here in Chicago, and elsewhere.
It should be a felony to put these 2 women in the same sentence (they  
 are polar OPPOSITES in EVERYTHING) - JUST b/c Pitt fell 
hard for Angie (SHOCKING!) and wanted to have kids and a family with her - 
someting he NEVER had before.

Angie's always been (brutally!) HONEST, and  she's never ever had any 
PR-mafia. 
RARITY in HW!
(Use your heads)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyways, we Know now there was no "home", and a FAKE "goldensh$t couple" (and they by association!) was fabricated by the tabloids (as Maniston said on Oprah's  show - BEFORE<br />
she decided to ride the J-Ps fame!!) Rotten!<br />
at the same time Maniston  was<br />
"friendly" f-ing V.V,  making  a laughingstock out of him here in Chicago, and elsewhere.<br />
It should be a felony to put these 2 women in the same sentence (they<br />
 are polar OPPOSITES in EVERYTHING) - JUST b/c Pitt fell<br />
hard for Angie (SHOCKING!) and wanted to have kids and a family with her -<br />
someting he NEVER had before.</p>
<p>Angie's always been (brutally!) HONEST, and  she's never ever had any<br />
PR-mafia.<br />
RARITY in HW!<br />
(Use your heads)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: S</title>
		<link>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2358419</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-mary-hart#comment-2358419</guid>
					<description>Angie, healthy and GORGEOUS, was promoting 2 (two) films @ the 
prestigious CFF. One is a BO hit, and her acting in Changeling is 
CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED again. Oscar buzz! Yay!

Angie SAID she'd "disappear" to be w/ her family, and that's exactly 
what she's DOING. You must be joking when you says she should show 
herself EVERYTIME someone says she gave birth - just to prove 
they were wrong! HELLO!

Quit talking BS about Angie b/c PITT, a grownass 44-yr-old, DUMPED
the ol' poor, poor and poor again, useless liar &#38; manipulator Maniston &#38;
her Huvane! HE did, and has never took responsibilities for HIS OWN 
FAILURES (and neither has Maniston!)
PR-IMAGES much? SAD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie, healthy and GORGEOUS, was promoting 2 (two) films @ the<br />
prestigious CFF. One is a BO hit, and her acting in Changeling is<br />
CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED again. Oscar buzz! Yay!</p>
<p>Angie SAID she'd "disappear" to be w/ her family, and that's exactly<br />
what she's DOING. You must be joking when you says she should show<br />
herself EVERYTIME someone says she gave birth - just to prove<br />
they were wrong! HELLO!</p>
<p>Quit talking BS about Angie b/c PITT, a grownass 44-yr-old, DUMPED<br />
the ol' poor, poor and poor again, useless liar &amp; manipulator Maniston &amp;<br />
her Huvane! HE did, and has never took responsibilities for HIS OWN<br />
FAILURES (and neither has Maniston!)<br />
PR-IMAGES much? SAD.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
