Comments on: R.I.P.

by: NYTimes

Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:27:01 +0000

Hmm, well, let's take a look at the numbers shall we? Because it's all about money, isn't it? Maybe - just maybe - people are tired of the completely biased liberal bs the NY Times spews and their circulation is down. I say good riddance to the NY Times. I don't see the Wall Street Journal having any similar problems. It's journalistic darwinism. I love it!

by: Spellcheck

Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:23:51 +0000

Re: Kim – We also need journalists that can spell. It's whether not weather - unless you want to report on the weather…

by: edt

Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:03:56 +0000

Thank goodness they're going under! Now if only the LA Times would bite the dust … the real news might be disseminated.

by: PETA

Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:56:54 +0000

Do people only read what's on the internet now?

That's not good. There's lot of bad grammar on the internet and people can't tell.

by: whatev

Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:57:52 +0000

What % of their staff is that? My sucky employeer is bending over for the investors and promising more than 10%….makes for over 8000 affected. sucks.

by: j

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:56:51 +0000

GOOD!!

by: anonymous

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:38:36 +0000

Good.

by: Michelle

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:37:03 +0000

Oh boo freaking hoo. Maybe if they actually researched their shit instead of printing bullshit. NYT isn't the paper it used to be that's for damn sure.

by: Bella

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:28:27 +0000

Liberals laying-off liberals…such a shame…tsk tsk…

by: Six dollars an inch

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:07:12 +0000

I've got a suggestion for the NYT's - layoff the ultra liberal editors first. Great start.