Comments on: Blame Ashton (Again)!

by: SicNic

Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:30:44 +0000

I'm actually excited to see the new episode of Pop Fiction. I'm gonna have my TV on E! tonight baybee!

by: a shrugger

Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:53:48 +0000

Re: daniel – Larry has no claim. However, Howard does have a valid claim. It was registered with the Writer's Guild. While that is not the same as getting it copywrited, it does put it on record that it was brought up to E! E! CAN be sued.

by: belicoso

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:32:26 +0000

How on earth could anyone deny the similarities of these ideas? This would be a slam dunk win for Stern and E! is right to distance themselves from the show. I just hope that Stern is satisfied with whatever money he gets from this suit and the one he has against Rita Cosby, enough so that he does not pursue the Marshall fortune. That suit would be totally futile and would obviously be a circus. Anna Nicole didn't deserve that money in life and Larry and Dannielynn aren't entitled to it now.

by: G.

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:54:34 +0000

This thing is on it's way down (slowly)
Once Kutcher understands that he's been brainwashed (seduced)
GO BOY! GET FREE of all of that bullshit.
Demi Moore will soon be keepin her face in a jar by the door…

by: Donnawannamarrawanna

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:16:47 +0000

Pereeeeez! Come on man! I love you, but with all the money you're making off this site, Id figure you would pay a little more attention!!! Its very very clear they have Ashtons back in this! Did you even read the statement? For someone so quick to point out everyone else's mistakes, you make quite a few yourself. What Im waiting for is Britney's Fuck You Perez letter, in which she tells you how insulted we all are that you dont care enough about your fans and your job to do it right, and where she demans that you appologise to us all! One mistake, two mistakes… but this is getting ridiculous!!! Do your job or dont do it at all!

by: is this really a lawsuit?

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:06:48 +0000

what i don't get is that this really isn't that new of a concept. its just not that original. they're just pulling pranks, so how does anyone own the rights to that? if i make a show that's a daily romantic drama, does every soap opera in the world get to sue me? lame.

by: daniel

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:41:58 +0000

you really expect a TV studio to buy a tv format idea written by a lawyer and a fuckwit? They must get hundreds of format ideas a week… larry is gonna have a problem proving ownership particularly as they have ZERO track record and Ashton has been making celeb prank shit for years!

by: Yak

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:33:39 +0000

How does this douche keep getting work? That 70's Show was almost unwatchable because of him. Every movie he's in sucks ass. His sense of humor is retarded and he's about as funny as a fart in a crowded elevator. He's an imbecile and he's with Demi Moore. WTF????? She must have a few loose screws herself.

by: a shrugger

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:59:01 +0000

I guess most of you have missed all the other reports on this. Anna Nicole thought of the concept, had it registered with the Writers Guild of America three years ago. She then pitched it to E! that same time with a rundown of the show. E! passed on it. TWo months ago, Howard tried to see if E! was interested. They said no. If you register something with the writer's guild, it is petty much yours. That being said, E1 got the idea from her and went with ASShton. A big no-no. A lawsuit would have merit on HKS's part.

by: john dixon

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:22:36 +0000

What's the difference? If they show it on their network then they are still copyright infringers.